Category: Uncategorized

  • Punching up or down

    Punching up or down

    Punch Up: When Comedy Risks Punching Down

  • From cradle to stage – A new works adventure

    Thank you Walterdale Theatre Associates. I was lucky enough to be chosen to direct 3 original scripts for Cradle to Stage. Three plays that have never been performed before. Three worlds that only existed in the minds of their writers until they landed in my hands.

    And that is where the strange magic begins.

    Getting to work with unproduced works was an amazing experience. Completely unbiased by previous productions. No shadow of another actor’s performance hanging over the room. No “this is how it’s always been done.” Everything was new. Fresh paint on an empty stage.

    At first, I have nothing but words. Pages. Ink. Silence between dialogue. I read the script and images begin forming in my head like stage lights slowly warming up. But here is the question that fascinates me:

    Can I ever truly see what the author saw?

    I can ask them, of course. I can chase intention, symbolism, rhythm, meaning. But then I wonder…what is the purpose of this process?

    If the play belongs to the author, should I ask endless questions in pursuit of their exact vision?

    If the play belongs to the script itself, perhaps the author should step away entirely. Let the words stand on their own legs under the harsh fluorescent lights of rehearsal. If the vision survives untouched, then the writing communicated clearly enough to live beyond its creator.

    And then comes the dangerous third possibility:

    What if the play belongs to the director?

    If my ego takes the wheel, then my responsibility is not preservation, but impact. My job becomes telling the story in the most emotionally powerful way I can, regardless of original intention. That, too, reveals something valuable about the strength and flexibility of the script.

    But theatre is never a kingdom ruled by one voice.

    These where theirs, then mine and then the performers…and now it belongs to the audience.

    “To be hanged” by Matt Dale “Wooden” by Kalin Jensen and “Far from the tree” by Marisa Scarbeau

    Then come the actors.

    We made our picks through an actor draft based on a short one minute monologue submitted by performers. Some read recipes. Some read Lego instructions. Some performed Shakespeare. Along with a basic CV, that tiny audition window became our first glimpse into possibility.

    And they were all good.

    So the choices became about nuance. Inflection. Diction. Emotional truth. Do they have the look in their eye? Can they play kindness without weakness? Can they become the cold villain, the exhausted mother, the desperate lover, the fighter, the saint?

    As a director, I had to look into my performers and help them find their path to the soul of the character. Every actor arrives through a different door, and often not the one you expected.

    One actress was very Latin, from El Salvador I believe. Fast talker. She had this incredible Latin fire. During rehearsal we discovered that the more emotional or angry her character became, the faster she spoke. Instead of fighting it, we embraced it and used it as a key storytelling tool. It was beautiful watching that instinct become character.

    Another performer apologized for talking too much with her hands because she was Italian. That too became part of the role. Once she embraced that Sicilian energy, it drove the character forward like a storm rolling downhill.

    The experienced performers arrived humble, generous, willing to support and elevate others around them. The newer actors came hungry, eager, passionate to listen and learn. Every rehearsal felt like opening another unknown door.

    Each play brought new discoveries. How actors followed me. How I followed them. Which stage directions carried enough value to be spoken aloud, and which only shattered the rhythm and momentum of the scene.

    I have said for a long time that pacing and tempo are the fastest ways to kill a story.

    A beautiful line delivered a second too long becomes theatre taxidermy. Perfectly preserved…and completely lifeless.

    Around rehearsal tables and on dusty stages, we questioned, debated, explored, failed, laughed, rewrote moments accidentally, and somewhere inside that beautiful chaos…the stories finally became alive.

    By trinity of writer, director, and actor, the play stops belonging to any one person.

    And maybe that is what theatre truly is.

    Not ownership.

    Translation.

    And a big beautiful thank you to the writers

    Matt Dale – “To be Hanged” Otis – Ethan Campos Sissy – Kennedy Hamdon Vance – Alex Doyle

    Kalin Jensen – “Wooden” Felix – Bailey Bieganek Mary – Julie Marko

    Marisa Scarbeau “Far from the Tree” Marigold (Golden) – Dixie Christina Albanez Ambrosia (Rosie) – Lita Pater Breaburn (Brea) – Courtney Nelson McIntosh (Mac) – Erwin Veugelers Chris (Not an apple) – Dave Breakenridge

    And lets not forget an amazing support staff! Sound and lightning designers Pat and Matt. The SM Adorra the explora. An ASM that scurries, Rebecca! Adrian (missing) and Vashnavi

    An then there was this guy…without him I would not have thought to explore The Walterdale.

    Thank you Masterflex!

  • Objective vs Subjective Insights : Judging Art

    Objective vs Subjective Insights : Judging Art

    This is a question that creeps into every rehearsal hall, every theatre lobby, and every late-night conversation after a show.

    Is there an objective way to judge whether a play or film is good?

    The answer is both simple and frustrating: yes and no.

    Think of it like judging a ship. You can objectively evaluate whether the hull leaks, whether the sails catch wind, and whether the rudder turns. But whether the voyage is beautiful… that belongs to the passengers.

    Storytelling lives in that same strange space.

    The Objective Side: Craft

    There are elements of storytelling that can be examined almost mechanically. Dramaturgs, critics, directors, and writers do this all the time.

    Internal Consistency

    A story does not need to follow the rules of the real world. It only needs to follow the rules of its own world.

    In fantasy, magic may exist. In absurdist theatre, logic may collapse entirely. But whatever rules the story establishes must remain consistent.

    The moment a story breaks its own laws, the audience feels it. The illusion cracks.

    Character Logic

    Characters must behave in ways that make sense within their motivations and circumstances.

    People can be irrational. They can be emotional. They can make terrible decisions. But even chaos needs a pattern.

    If a character suddenly changes personality without cause, the audience feels the gears grinding behind the curtain.

    Structure and Rhythm

    Stories have pacing the way music has tempo.

    Most narratives follow a recognizable movement:

    • Setup
    • Rising conflict
    • Crisis
    • Climax
    • Resolution

    If the rhythm stalls, drags, or resolves too quickly, the story feels unsatisfying. The audience may not be capable of articulating why, but they feel it.

    A story without rhythm is like a song without a beat.

    Clarity of Stakes

    The audience needs to understand two things:

    • What the characters want
    • What happens if they fail

    If those stakes are unclear, engagement fades quickly. A story without stakes is like a boxing match where nobody throws a punch.

    Thematic Cohesion

    Strong stories tend to orbit a central idea. Everything in the play supports it.

    Dialogue, imagery, character choices, and conflict all pull toward the same gravity.

    When that happens, the story feels complete and inevitable.

    These elements form the craft of storytelling, and they can be examined with a fairly objective lens.

    But craft is only half of the equation.

    The Subjective Side: Experience

    Two audiences can watch the exact same performance and leave with completely different reactions.

    Why?

    Because every audience member brings their own world into the theatre.

    Their culture.
    Their experiences.
    Their expectations.
    Even their mood that day.

    A joke that lands perfectly with one audience might fall flat with another. A moment that moves one person to tears might leave someone else unmoved.

    Anyone who works in live theatre knows this phenomenon well. Some nights the audience rides every moment with you. Other nights they sit quietly, watching, absorbing, but never quite leaning forward.

    The show is the same. The room is not. Even if the audience reacts differently, they all must understand the situation the same. Even if it doesn’t feel the same.

    The Middle Ground: Shared Agreement

    There is, however, a space between objectivity and subjectivity.

    When large numbers of people, across time and culture, repeatedly agree that a work has value, we begin to recognize it as something special.

    Philosophers often call this intersubjective agreement.

    It is not purely objective. It is not purely subjective. It is something built collectively over time.

    Works like Shakespeare’s plays, The Godfather, or Waiting for Godot continue to resonate because generation after generation finds meaning within them.

    They become cultural landmarks.

    Theatre Has an Extra Layer

    Film is fixed. Once it is made, it never changes.

    Theatre is alive.

    A brilliant script can fail in a weak production. A modest script can soar when actors, director, and design align perfectly.

    When judging theatre, we are often evaluating three different elements at once:

    • The quality of the script
    • The quality of the production
    • The energy of the performance

    The magic only happens when those three elements come together.

    A Simple Practical Test

    Many directors quietly rely on a simple checklist when evaluating whether a story works.

    Does the story:

    • Make sense within its own world?
    • Maintain tension and momentum?
    • Deliver emotional payoff?
    • Leave the audience thinking or feeling something afterward?

    If those elements are present, the story usually works.

    Whether people like it is another matter entirely.

    The Theatre Paradox

    A play can be technically excellent and still fail with audiences.

    And sometimes a messy, unconventional, chaotic story becomes beloved.

    Stories do not live in isolation. They live in the relationship between the work and the audience experiencing it.

    That relationship is where meaning truly happens.

    In the end, perhaps the best way to judge a play or film is not simply to ask whether it is good or bad.

    Instead, we might ask a different question.

    Did the story stay true to the world it created?

    If it did, the audience is free to step inside and decide the rest for themselves.

  • Auditioning…The good, the bad and the ugly!

    Directors all audition differently. Some look for projection. Some for accents, movement, or strong presence. Others look for malleability and how easily an actor can be directed.

    Understanding what your actors are capable of is incredibly valuable. A cold read tells you very little. It mostly tells you that someone can read. Some actors need repetition. Some need time to settle. Others shine through physicality, interpretation, or emotional connection. There is far more to discover about an actor than what happens in a first read.

    There are three things I want to learn during an audition.

    First: movement.
    Can you move well? I often ask actors to pantomime a simple task. Build an IKEA shelf. Assemble a baby’s mobile. Add pressure, perhaps they are in a hurry or frustrated. Showing an action can be as powerful as speaking it. I look for posture, tempo, physical storytelling. Sometimes we play a movement game or simply walk the room under different imagined circumstances.

    Second: a prepared monologue.
    This shows how an actor interprets material they have had time to explore. A monologue reveals thought, intention, and personal interpretation. Even more important is what happens when given direction. Do they adjust? Do they evolve the piece? Can they reshape the moment?

    Third: improvisation with dialogue.
    An improv exercise reveals confidence, courage, connection, and charisma. It is not about being right or wrong. It is about presence and willingness to play.

    Every production has specific characters to fill. But auditions are also about something larger. They are about the future of the company. We are always looking for a passion for performing. With passion everyone can learn and grow. We can teach how to make unique acting choices, dynamic range and how to take direction. How to score a script and interoperate subtext.

    One of the quiet killers of community theatre is casting the same people in the same roles over and over. Variety strengthens a troupe. Rotating opportunities helps actors grow and keeps a company vibrant. Changing the cast dynamic can be challenging, but it is often where the real growth happens.

    Xavier Jeanne

  • A divided tribe…

    At the beginning of any journey, yours or your troupe’s, you cannot do it alone. Theatre is not a solo swim. It is an ocean, and most of us dive in thinking we’ll paddle politely in the shallow end. Instead, we meet a storm. Passion becomes a typhoon. Energy crashes like waves against your body. The hunger for stage lights feels tidal.

    To survive that, you need people. Friends. Your theatre family.

    On my own path, I chased knowledge like it was oxygen. I followed directors. I asked questions. I annoyed mentors. I clawed my way toward the stage. And yes, sometimes that meant less clawing and more sitting in a pub, sketching impossible dreams on damp napkins. But even that was community. Even that was fuel.

    Then you find your clique.

    A clique is a beautiful and dangerous thing. It can be a fortress of loyalty, a band of artists who catch one another mid-fall. But only if it is built on honesty and communication. Otherwise, it becomes a locked room.

    What happens when your clique wants different futures? When one dreams of stretching, experimenting, building new muscles, while another wants to refine the passions already burning inside them?

    Unity is not sameness. Unity is support.

    In small troupes, I often see warmth. A seat pulled out. A script shared. An openness to the wandering artist who arrives hopeful and nervous. But as groups grow, cracks can widen. I have watched companies split like fault lines under pressure. Members drift to other stages. Alliances shift. Applause becomes territorial.

    The hardest fracture I observed came from the top. Founders who wanted different things and did not say so clearly. One longed to expand, to learn, to deepen their understanding of theatre’s power. The other wanted to create within the passions already alive in him. Neither wish was wrong. Both could have thrived. But expectations replaced conversation. Assumptions replaced clarity.

    They could have allowed each other freedom. Individual projects. Separate explorations. Then come together when aligned, when collaboration truly served them both. Instead, silence did the splitting. The group changed forever.

    So listen.

    Support ideas that are not your own. Stay open to new people. Teach them. Share what you know. Give them the creative fire and the tools to wield it.

    Create the monster of change.

    Then do not cage it.

    Feed it.

    Oh, and always wear sunscreen!

    Xavier Jeanne

  • This is Canada!

    I sit here watching the Canadian women’s curling team win Bronze. And I find myself thinking about the emotion of that moment.

    Winning Bronze feels different than losing the game for Silver. One is a victory earned. The other can feel like something slipped away. The Canadian women’s hockey team didn’t win Silver. They lost Gold.

    On stage, we live in similar emotional territory.

    Theatre is absolutely a team sport. Every person has to leave it all out there. Every entrance, every cue, every breath depends on trust. You don’t play for yourself. You play for the story. You play for your castmates.

    Curling might be the closest athletic cousin to theatre. Every stone is thrown to set up the next player. You sweep for someone else’s shot. You sacrifice the glory throw to build the winning end. Success is layered. It is collaborative.

    Hockey is no different. Every player has a role. If one position fails, the whole structure cracks.

    The big difference? On stage, we are not competing against another cast. There is no opponent across the ice.

    The competition is internal.

    Did we trust enough?
    Did we prepare enough?
    Did we serve the story fully?

    Maybe the comparison isn’t perfect. Theatre doesn’t hand out medals.

    But it does demand teamwork. And when it works, when everyone commits to the shot that sets up the next shot, that’s its own kind of podium.

    There is something beautifully Canadian about the Olympics. Quiet grit. Long winters. Years of rehearsal in empty rinks and frozen mornings that most of us never see. And then, suddenly, two weeks where the whole world is watching.

    Milan and Cortina d’Ampezzo become the stage. Snow becomes spotlight.

    Our athletes have trained not for applause, but for that razor-thin moment when preparation meets pressure. Strength. Focus. Grace. The Canadians have carried themselves with all three.

    And hockey… silver is a strange medal. It means you were good enough to reach the final, strong enough to battle to the end, and human enough to feel the sting of that last loss. It is heartbreak wrapped in achievement.

    But tears are not weakness. When the tears of loss dry, they do not leave us empty. They clear space. Space for pride. Space for gratitude. Space for the joy of knowing you stood among the very best in the world and belonged there.

    To every Canadian athlete who laid it all out in the snow, on the ice, on the slopes and tracks: you have already won something bigger than a podium.

    You should be proud.

    Maybe this is more about being Canadian than theatre. In this moment, I see the athletes and the artists as one. Different arenas, same courage. Different uniforms, same pulse. We train in the quiet. We step into the lights. We risk something real for the sake of something greater than ourselves.

    This is Canada!

    Author – Xavier Jeanne

  • Mentors in theatre

    Who Should Mentor the Newbies? And When Are You Ready?

    Community theatre is starving for strong mentorship.

    Year after year, someone directs a successful show and is suddenly elevated to “mentor.” It reminds me of the medical mantra: Watch one. Do one. Teach one. It sounds efficient. It sounds noble.

    But doctors train for up to 15 years before they ever reach that stage.

    In most community theatre groups, unless you are extremely lucky, it becomes the blind leading the blind. Our “education” is often a $20 weekend workshop covering the bare basics. We pick up a cool blocking trick, get excited, and overuse it because no one taught us nuance. No one taught us why it works.

    The fundamentals are easy. Stage left. Stage right. Upstage. Downstage. Lights on. Lights off.

    That’s not theatre.

    New directors often replicate reality. Literal kitchens. Literal offices. Literal movement. They struggle to break the literal connection and embrace suspension of disbelief.

    We should be teaching energy and flow first. Pacing. Tempo. Rhythm. Forget the set. If your actors connect with the audience’s energy, you don’t need elaborate scenery.

    The story is not an automatic pass. A powerful script can transcend mediocre performance. “That was so sad.” “That was so funny.” That’s great writing, not necessarily great directing.

    Emotional energy is more valuable than visual precision. One or two strong elements are enough to place the audience exactly where they need to be.

    And scene changes are silent killers. Unless you hired a heard of elephants before their ballet training. Then the thunder rolls…

    Three pieces, rearranged made 4 different scenes. Opera booth, automat table, business desk, fancy bar. Scene changes were engaging and curious.

    Three pieces, rearranged made 4 different scenes. Opera booth, automat table, business desk, fancy bar. Scene changes were engaging and curious.

    How long before someone whispers, “When are the Oilers playing?” Forty-five seconds of dead air for a thirty-second scene. Actors clogging a single exit. Stagehands fumbling with salt shakers and napkins.

    If it stops the world of the play, you’ve broken the spell.

    Make transitions part of the story. Move in character. Let the set breathe inside the world you’ve built. Theatre is momentum. Protect it.

    Mentorship should not be accidental. It should be earned through depth, not survival.

    So again: who should mentor the newbies?
    And when are you truly ready to teach?

  • The problem with community theatre…

    This feels like the beginning of a manifesto whispered backstage while the house lights dim.

    You’re describing a cycle that many rural and mid-sized communities fall into. It begins beautifully. A teacher with fire in their chest. A church pianist who can wrangle a chorus. A few brave souls craving safe adventure beneath stage lights. They mount a farce. Change the names. Tease the mayor. Sell pie at intermission. The town roars with laughter and ownership.

    And it works.

    Then it works again.

    Then it works so well that growth quietly stops.

    Blocking becomes ceremonial.
    Square up.
    Plant feet.
    Deliver line.
    Exit.

    “Don’t turn your back.”
    “Stay center.”
    “Project louder.”

    These become commandments carved in community theatre stone.

    The audience loves you. Programs get signed. Someone brings rum. You are local royalty for three weekends in November. The machine hums. Why disrupt a full house?

    Complacency rarely announces itself. It slips in dressed as comfort.

    The real loss is not technical polish. It is curiosity.

    When directors repeat inherited habits without questioning them. When actors never feel the friction of new technique. When workshops become the same three exercises recycled every season, the art form shrinks. The community still applauds, but the ceiling lowers inch by inch.

    Your instinct about the cure is strong.

    Exchange.

    Borrow a director from the neighboring town. Send one of yours there. Invite a university student to run a movement intensive. Or if there is no university nearby, trade expertise regionally. A lighting designer one month. A dramaturg the next. Even a Zoom masterclass can shake dust from the rafters.

    This field thrives on cross-pollination. When new eyes enter the rehearsal hall, sacred cows wobble. Actors learn they can turn their backs if the moment demands it. Blocking becomes motivated instead of symmetrical. Projection becomes connection instead of volume. “Big but natural” becomes specific and truthful.

    And something magical happens. The audience grows too.

    Not just in number. In appetite.

    They begin to crave nuance. Silence. Risk. The kind of tension that makes a room hold its breath instead of just waiting for the next punchline.

    For a group like Infinite Imagination, especially working in Camrose and the surrounding region, we’re uniquely positioned to model this. If you already collaborate with other organizations. Imagine formalizing it. A “Director Exchange Series.” A regional movement lab. A rotating guest artist season. Brand it as growth, not correction.

    Because this is not about shame. It is about evolution.

    Community theatre should not be a pond. It should be a river.

    Rivers stay fresh because they move. They meet other rivers. They carry new minerals downstream. They carve deeper channels over time.

    The hardest step is not finding the talent. It is checking the ego at the dressing room door and saying, “We are good. But we can be better.”

    That sentence alone can transform a town’s artistic future.

  • Imagineers

    The Weekly Dispatch

    ​infiniteimaginationtt.ca​

    Hello Imagineers!

    ​

    We welcome you all to our first newsletter. As we build the New Infinite Imagination to create an improv team, a Murder Mystery Team, a Haunt team and with guidance and direction an educational organization to help build all levels of theatre.

    ​

    Here is what we are up to. Please com to our web page infiniteimaginationtt.ca for more information.

    ​

    Please, once again we welcome you to join our team!

    Thanks for reading. See you soon!

    Mike and the Imagineers

    Recent articles

    Bridgerton Event-CAS

    We are creating a night to honor the Artists of Camrose and area! A night themed around “Bridgerton”. Looking for actors to perform a few scenes from the TV show and be in character and engaging with the artists and the people.

    Drop in Workshop

    Here is a bi-monthly drop in workshop to get to know us. To learn from us. To build community Teams for Murder Mystery, Improv and The Haunt!

    ​infiniteimaginationtt.ca​

    2026 Newsletter

    ​
    ​

    ​

    Built with Kit​

  • BRR Murder Mystery 2025

    Star Wars theme on the Battle River Rail – Nov 29th and 30th

    Need performers!